In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard on their studies.
what do you think are the causes of this?
what solutions can you suggest?
Architecture has been always an important aspect of population's life. Modern type of it lets cities and towns to be more beautiful for both visitors and citizens, as many people claim. This essay will argue why this idea is not completely wrong and that it is essential to save distinguishing features of every nationality as well as city's, despite of some benefits of modern architecture.
First things first, as we can see, every decade, century gave the world society upgrades and modernisation, making our countries more attractive in one or another way. Nowadays there are different ideas and projects that could be found in diverse types of settings, where the main principle is to make them more eco-friendly as well as unusual. While, to give an example, both amateur and professional designers took new colours and extraordinary deco to the town, like in Amsterdam, Salzburg, the governments hardly tried to make places of living more comfortable and, it goes without saying - beautiful. These instances have bolstered existing opinions about what is the current beauty of city, completely forgetting about other aspects.
Meanwhile, by continuing these huge new constructions and changes in countries, our future generation will totally lose the sence of understanding what was the art and history. Every city is unique with its traditional, ancient and historical buildings, which make them recognizable and memorable for everyone. So, for instance, after a few decades, as many researches claim, approximately all places of living on the planet will look the same, from steel, glass, iron with high-rise appartements, wich pick on the sky and for this reason people will feel depressed and dreaming about vacations in far-off located islands. Consequently, the uniqueness will been lost and at the same time doing towns less attractive. Overall, the idea that recent architecture will definitely been beautiful for all places is quite preposterous and this is why we should preserve as many as we can old towns of cities to save the real beauty.
To sum up, this essay argued that authorities, who claim that modern architecture has made cities more attractive, may not understand all the effects of a huge upgrading and should be more aware of saving old buildings, which will show the mix of the uniqueness of history with cutting-edge buildings that could be named the truly beautiful. In my opinion, not only upgrades have made our countries more good-looking, but also the combination of old and new itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | koinoyokan | 89 | view |
| 2016-08-16 | darshilbhayani92 | 84 | view |
| 2014-11-19 | mfiji18 | 80 | view |
- Why do people help each other? 11
- Some secondary schools provide students with a general education across a range of subjects whereas others focus on fewer subjects releated to a particular career.Do you think the advantages of a focused education outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- town of Hillingford between 2000 and 2015 92
- geothermal energy 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f some benefits of modern architecture. First things first, as we can see, every...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 653, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'will be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: will be; has been
...d islands. Consequently, the uniqueness will been lost and at the same time doing towns l...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, so, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24509803922 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93644762204 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59068627451 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.972033087 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.857142857 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087513816321 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312545322146 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224314563576 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.052722274527 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111045357609 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.