Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
Business success is a subject about which employers are concerned these days. In terms of this matter, employers go to the extra mile to motivate employees and allocate some rewards, like money, to the best one. Notwithstanding employers believe it is the best impetus, it has some disadvantages in my estimation. Getting disappointed and losing confidence are some of its demerits which influence other employees. However, there are other kinds of reward motivating people as well.
Getting disappointed is the first demerit of paying money to someone as a reward. There is no doubt that a team-work works jointly. Hence, when a person is chosen for extra money, others assume that they are disparaged and no one understands their attempts. In such circumstances, they are reluctant to continue their work eagerly. However, if the reason of allocating extra money to someone is explicit, others will perceive their own weakness and will admire their honorable colleague.
Another drawback of some encouragements like money is losing confidence. It does not take much common sense to find out a disappointed person doesn’t enjoy enough confidence to surmount problems. Based on immense explorations in the domain of psychology, 70% of employees who are working gloomily can’t make a correct decision, due to lack of confidence and self esteem. They are always contemplating whether their boss likes their decision or suggestion or not!
Beside paying excess money as a reward, there are other kinds of encouragement which are less detrimental to others’ spirit. Granting promotion is one of the multitude solutions which can act as an incentive for some people. Not only does it represent the best employee’s competence, but also it provides circumstances which the best can guide others!
All in all, these days, companies’ developments have haunted employers dreams. Thus, they spare no effort to courage employees to do their best and they pay money as reward. Unfortunately, these kinds of reward have reverse impact including getting disappointed and losing confidence-on others. As I stood before, there are various kinds of rewards such as granting promotion. These kinds of award enjoy less negative impact and courage others as wel
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | quytnee | 74 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | Fedya | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | sheep | 80 | view |
- The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this How could this be controlled 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- In many countries people throw away a lot of food from restaurants and shops Why do you think people waste food in this way What can be done to reduce the amount of food thrown away 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34550561798 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97196188439 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558988764045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0168175779 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.15 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268321842358 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766233348636 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530145723604 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143213616197 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455601103519 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.