Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more advantage than disadvantages?
In many parts of the world today, more folks have concerned about work. It is hypothesised that there will probably be more sabotages to human if staff are INTERRUPTED by bosses every TIME. This essay attempts to point out that this statement is quite convincING.
To begin with, there have been numerous dwellers who are in favour of the idea in some aspects. First and foremost, employees in all probability vanish their incentives of work in some prospects. This can be fathomed that folks cannot have their freedom in leisure time, so their sensations will probably be detrimental affected. As a result, staff can determine to quit jobs, so economies of firms will be sabotaged in sides. As highlight for this point, in CNN articles, due to awareness of aforementioned ideas, firms these days have striven their best in order not to contact their workers in off days. As a bonus, this tenet has prompted deleterious impacts of workers. It is obvious that employees will perceive stressful due to work, so they reluctantly endure numerous genres of mental sickness. Indeed, in Vietnam, governors of this nation triggered some rules which entail restrictions of enterprise in off days of staff. Plus, relationships between employments and workers can be vanished. Apparently, workers can be hostile to managers in some spectacles if they do not have chances to enjoy their free times. From this point, companies will be subjects which are rendered various disadvantages in revenues or others. These views were demonstrated concretely in Vin organisation in Vietnam in 2010 by virtue of the fact that managers did not have adequate abilities to invent tactics of tackling relationships with staff. IT TOOK 3 years more or less for this enterprise to handle tough issue.
Vice versa, some people deem that this tenet is quite crucial to some jobs currently. It is assumed that there have been numerous emergency circumstances which employers compulsorily contact with their employees in off times. Harmful consequences which relate to business contracts and the like will instantly appear if employees are not contacted immediately. These situations are common in most of companies today. However, these prospects ought to be limited strictly in order to cease abundant drawbacks of these issues.
In brief, there are some persuadable elements which support the idea: it is the best for bosses to respect workers in leisure times in lieu of creations of interruptions.
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that computer skills should be made as fourth skill in education To what extent do you agree 67
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Art is considered as an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science technology and business Why do you think this What could be done to encourage people to ta 56
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety Therefore some people think that government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits To what extent you agree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t to contact their workers in off days. As a bonus, this tenet has prompted delete...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, so, well, in brief, as a result, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83774117918 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0942719279 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1818181818 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290921366556 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811393598253 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463193481479 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159203389579 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771589883992 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.