Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh than the disadvantages?
These days, it is believed preferable for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. There are both advantages and disadvantages for the children. In this essay, I absolutely agree that it gives more advantages rather than disadvantages in some cases.
In the one hand, the main benefit of that matter is they to easier to learn a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. It is because the burden lesson at primary school still low and they are too easy to catch on the lesson. For example, they learn to know about the stuff in their around. As the result, when they continue their education to higher not start from zero again. It is no doubt advantages of the children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school.
On the other hand, the negative of learning a foreign language at primary school is making the children forget their mother tongue. It is due to mostly the kids’ time at the school rather than in home, special at international primary school that their daily language uses English. So, indirectly they are used to with the foreign language and slowly the will forget their first language. As the result, they will lazy to use their mother tongue again. So, there is no doubt disadvantages of the children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school.
To sum up, from right here I stand that I believed the advantages of learning a foreign language at primary school rather than at secondary school this outweigh than the disadvantages for the kids. In my opinion, it gives more benefit than detriment to the children such as easier following the lesson when they continue their education to higher education and more confidence to compete in the class.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Elmira Gh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | trucn | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Salemo | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Asadbek2001 | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 67
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
- The pie charts bellow show the comparison of the different kinds of energy production of france in two years 67
- The bar chart shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union.The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther than disadvantages in some cases. In the one hand, the main benefit of tha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a foreign language at primary school. On the other hand, the negative of learn...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a foreign language at primary school. To sum up, from right here I stand that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, still, for example, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88486842105 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54658594646 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407894736842 0.561755894193 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2324980644 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.60451215562 0.244688304435 247% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.252501816934 0.084324248473 299% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.200220800619 0.0667982634062 300% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.462660840894 0.151304729494 306% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122458230023 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 8.58950901804 77% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.