Some individuals feel that working from home, while of benefits for employees, is actually drawbacks for employers.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Thanks to the prevalence of communication technology, being a telecommuter is no longer outrageous for now. Adversary to this procedure would argue that employees could take a plethora of advantages from this practice, on the contrary, not organizations. From my personal viewpoint, employers could make use of this practice for more efficient management.
To commence with, working from home could save corporations office rental costs to a great extent. For example, in Hanoi, rental costs of an office in the inner city have rocketed to a prohibitive level for several years, consequently, numerous ventures have resolved their financial problem by allowing their staff to work from home. Otherwise, real-estate rental payment could be a burden to the business’ fund, which could be an obstacle to allocate money to improve their service.
Equally vital, regular operating payment and initial investment in tangible facilities could be cut down to the minimum as all employees are telecommuting. Furthermore, since allowances on lunch or individually transporting activities are omitted, enterprises could monthly put aside a great amount of money.
Last but not least, allowing employees to work at home, companies can widen the base from which they recruit and boost the chances of capitalizing on rich human capital. For instance, parents with childcare responsibilities and those with disabilities prefer to work at home. Additionally, the distance between their workplace and their place of residence would not be a disadvantage. Home-working enables workers to perform their job at ease, and thus give corporations more options in human resource use.
To conclude, I disagree with this statement in light of the fact that could execute this innovation to build up their ventures more economically by understanding those far-reaching merits of working from home.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-05 | viethung123 | 95 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | viethung123 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the different type of goods and services purchased online in Australia Canada and the United Kingdom last year 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- Attendance at cultural events in Great Britain 96
- The chart below gives information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 78
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners How far do you agree or disagree with this view 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...locate money to improve their service. Equally vital, regular operating payment and in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, so, thus, for example, for instance, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54703832753 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14886590783 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623693379791 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2462657445 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.461538462 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204083501522 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743790759488 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496171816721 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107330988826 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389963246996 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.