Some international companies are very powerful now and many people believe that it is a negative development. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give your reasons and relevant examples.
Some people believe that due the fact that some businesses are in much power currently, it is a negative development. However, others oppose such a believe.
To begin with, it is a negative development as some companies are very powerful now. There is a high chance for business monopoly. The more power a company has, the more business opportunities they want across the globe. Anglo American exemplify this precisely. It is an American company which invests in mining. It owns majority of shares in South African mines. Of recent, it seeks opportunities around African countries which has valueable minerals for mining. Due to the fact that it is powerfull and well established, it is winning trust of most mines in this African countries. As a result, it denies the newly developed companies avenues of investments. This therefore, enriches the rich and powerfull businesses, subjecting the unfamous ones to poverty.
In addition, international companies which posses more power degrades the environment more. For instance, they buy large land in foreighn countries to set up their firms. This large land should be cleared to create space for a building. Deforestrating the land causes plant species to extinct. It is therefore not worth the doubt that these companies brings negativity overall.
In contrary, it is not a negative development for international companies to posess more power. They create more employment. They create more employment rather, in foreighn countries. For example, coca cola is one the dominating international companies across Africa. As a result, it has created more employment to Africans. Consequently, the economy in such countries is promoted Thus, this elucidates that international companies possesing much power is not a positive development after all.
In conclusion, wether international companies which are powerfull is a negative development has trigered a debate amongst individuals. However, I assert that it is negative to some extent but positive in some ways.
- School children are becoming far too dependent on computers. This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills. Teachers need to avoid using computers in the classroom at all costs and go back to teaching basic study skills.Do you agree or d 67
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life die out it is pointless to keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or kn 67
- Subjects such as art, sport and music are being dropped out of the school curriculum for subjects such as information technology. Many children suffer as a result of these changes. To what extend do you agree or reject the idea of moving these subjects fr 67
- Some people believe that it is better to build new museums and town halls instead of renovating the old ones.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. 45
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.Give reasons for your answer and inclu 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...evelopment. However, others oppose such a believe. To begin with, it is a negative devel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...elopment. However, others oppose such a believe. To begin with, it is a negative devel...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some extent but positive in some ways.
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'after all', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'as a result', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237430167598 0.247107183377 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.148044692737 0.155533422707 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.122905027933 0.0946595960268 130% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0502793296089 0.0501214627716 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0502793296089 0.0437548338989 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.103351955307 0.122226691241 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0279329608939 0.0403226058552 69% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.08406564638 2.80594681477 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0251396648045 0.0326793684256 77% => OK
Particles: 0.00279329608939 0.00163938923432 170% => OK
Determiners: 0.106145251397 0.0861772015684 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00279329608939 0.021408717616 13% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0111731843575 0.011925033212 94% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2024.0 1933.35771543 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 316.048096192 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.44585987261 6.12580529183 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.420382165605 0.374742101984 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.34076433121 0.28420135186 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.273885350318 0.203846283523 134% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.184713375796 0.137316102897 135% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08406564638 2.80594681477 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.037074148 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509554140127 0.56093040696 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.8494349114 60.7387585426 85% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0891783567 155% => OK
Sentence length: 12.56 20.7743622355 60% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1186301078 49.517814964 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.96 127.492653851 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.56 20.7743622355 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.814263465372 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 46.636433121 49.1944974215 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.48314606742 1.69124875643 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253288018709 0.332605444948 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114639068659 0.102741220458 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.137965277906 0.0668466124924 206% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.439494719602 0.534860350844 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15117990238 0.148594505496 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845196871822 0.134430193775 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897185451324 0.0742795772207 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.30844716584 0.324371583561 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0515679453821 0.0638462369009 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178422444969 0.228012699653 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618859782296 0.058150111329 106% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.