Although there are some museums that charge nothing for entry, people still have to pay admission fees for many museums. In my opinion, by charging for admission, museums can use that funds to make necessary improvements, otherwise, it is impossible to maintain valuable arts.
Charging money from people for their entry into museums can have a great number of benefits. The most obvious one is that it can be used to enhance museums, ranging from the conditions inside to security. Firstly, many museums show unique arts from different centuries, so such arts need extra care to preserve and the costs are expensive. Without the funds, such a thing is impossible. Secondly, museums need to be equipped with state-of-the-art security systems, such as surveillance cameras and a well-trained security team because most criminals and thieves are keeping an eye on priceless arts to sell in black markets and to make easy money. Therefore, museums need to have a large amount of funding for those security measures.
On the other hand, charging admission fees to people also has disadvantages. One possible effect is that it becomes a barrier between the public and museums. In other words, as people are obsessed with possessions and only value material things, they might not spend their money on going to museums to just feel arts, which cannot be possessed. Another problem is that such fees discourage poor people to go to museums since they have to struggle even in their everyday lives. As a result, the poor will think arts are only for the rich, which is definitely a negative consequence.
In conclusion, despite the negative effects, I believe that charging money for admission to museums is the only solution to well maintain unique age-old arts.
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...hings, they might not spend their money on going to museums to just feel arts, which can...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
... to museums since they have to struggle even in their everyday lives. As a result, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09310344828 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7002025731 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562068965517 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0867114551 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299941244732 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108804204068 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967409536872 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196776060016 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543432830589 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.