The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990 and 2000.
The table compares the seven countries in terms of percentages of personal income going into savings in the years 1970, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, Italians were the biggest money savers in both 1970 and 1990; however, in 2000, the French and Japaneses took over its place.
In 1970, an average Italian saved 29.5% of his total income, and that figure was approximately twice as high as those for France, Japan and Germany. The savings rate in the UK, the USA and Canada didn’t show much difference, though Canada had the lowest one with 5.6%.
In 1990, all countries saw a decrease of between 1% to 11% in proportions of savings, with the exception of Germany, whose figure remained unchanged at 13.8%, and Canada, where saving rates increased significantly by 6%.
In 2000, France and Japan became the leading countries, with 13.6% of saving rates, followed by Germany, Italy and the UK, with just under 12% each. However, Americans saved only 4% of their total income, and in Canada, just 1.9% of money went into savings, which had become the lowest rate during the given period.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph and table below show the number of fishers in millions for different regions in 1980 1990 and 2000 and the world s top exporters of fish in 2000 84
- The diagram below explains the process of recycling plastic bottles for new uses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...en 1% to 11% in proportions of savings, with the exception of Germany, whose figure remained unchange...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92432432432 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3486222124 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643243243243 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3644529014 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279489425694 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131913959207 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148327850335 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170094282808 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161468267941 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.