Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people are of the opinion that proper outfits play a critical role in the working place, there are others who claim that it is the quality of work that matters. In the light of this, I do think both views are reasonable as each has its own merits.
To begin with, it is undeniable that completion of working tasks is one of the top goals that most companies want to achieve. Thus, many executives and employers always create an environment where their employees are comfortable and happy. This results in the stimulus of innovation and creativity among people. Moreover, various organizations do not pay too much attention to the employees' appearance. For example, many workers do not have to wear uniforms, instead they are allowed to dress according to their preferences.
However, it is necessary for companies to care about their staff's physical appearance. One of the foremost reasons for this tendency is the firm's image, which is presented to their business partners and customers. This can be illustrated in many special events and ceremonies. In these settings, wearing a suite is considered as a good way to show one's respect to others. An individual represents the whole image of a corporation so it is highly recommended to dress wisely. Furthermore, your outlook is the first thing that people see when it comes to a meeting. Hence, a fine outfit can become an attractive point to grab others' attention and then get a chance to bring out your thinking.
In conclusion, from some aforementioned justifications, although the ultimate working result is the core matter to achieve success, I am inclined that appropriate dressings can strengthen the organizations' accomplishments.
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ns do not pay too much attention to the employees appearance. For example, many workers d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...forms, instead they are allowed to dress according to their preferences. Howe...
^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... can become an attractive point to grab others attention and then get a chance to brin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11428571429 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00882206255 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3776022068 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198124217538 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514771882272 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428040676013 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115841932731 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581745554418 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.