In recent world, there are saveral kinds of companies with different works. Some institutions pose the rules to their stuff that they should wear dresses that looks dashing. However, other organizations put pressure into the output rather than clothngs of their emplyees. I think clothing depends upon the work of one company.
One the one hand, it is undeniable that emplyees should dressed well. This is because, some institutions are service based, and they have to get in touch with the people of all walks of life. For example, In a bank, the officer have to conduct with a poor person as well as some richest persons at the same period of time. Therefore, they have to be on well dressed so that they can face any genre of people weather wealthy or poor. Furthermore, if it comes to a car selling company, they also should have to be well dressed. A car seller have to communicate with wealthy persons. If that person feel uneasy because of the dress code of the seller, he would not wish to come again. So, in this matter emplyees ought to wear the suitable cloths.
On the other hand, some organisations require the innovative ideas, new strategies, and hard work from their emplyees. To illistrate, worker of a production company have to work hard, so, there is no function of dressing, they can wear whatever they want. In addition, emplyees of Google and Facebook need not to wear formal cloths as they have not to deal with customers. They require unique ideas, new things that can bring more facilities for their user, and new servises over online. For this, they have to use their brain rather than body. As a consequence of this, those companies are not requiered to maintain any dress code.
To put in a nutshell, i think well dress up should be considered for those companies who have to conduct with costomers to look smart and influence their consumers. Others do not need to maintain a strict clothing.
- The diagram below shows the process of using water to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 51
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants why do you think people waste food what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 64
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ell as some richest persons at the same period of time. Therefore, they have to be on well dre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wear'?
Suggestion: wear
...mplyees of Google and Facebook need not to wear formal cloths as they have not to deal...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o wear formal cloths as they have not to deal with customers. They require unique...
^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ny dress code. To put in a nutshell, i think well dress up should be considere...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73293768546 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48504583628 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528189910979 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9701065545 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.75 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.85 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113270150661 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389756421655 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321025337247 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840102141435 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192266307316 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.