Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?
There is no doubt that children certainly fond of toys. As a result, many parents buy a lot of toys for their sons or daughters. They believe that toys can implement child’s learning, ranging mental to physical development. Some say this is an important part of junior’s life, while others argue it cause more harm than good. In this essay, I will discuss at both sides of the argument and give my opinion.
There are several positive effects of toys on the growth of children. With advancement in research and technologies, toys have become more interactive and innovation over the years. Obviously, there are many research point that mental and physical efficiency are raised by playing toys. Furthermore, they make opportunities which parents can spend time, talk or even look after their child. Lastly, supporters of buying toys highlight the responsibility that children will learn. They also say that this skill leads to greater adulthood success later in life.
On the other hand, opponents of serving more toys to childhood life feel that it uses up money which could be better spent on books such as drawing books. In addition, it might be said that it is unwise to give guns or swords to children to play with their friends which probably make them more aggressive. If parental awareness is not enough, their children would suffer from feeling isolation and less communicate with worldwide social. Unfortunately, socializing nowadays problems caused by isolated experiences in young age.
In conclusion, although it is common belief that buying a lot of toys will enhance intelligence for children, I believe it is not necessary and that it waste budget in the majority of cases. Personally, I think toys should be judged to the only thing which helps increase child’s development.
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 48
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 75
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 61
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...nior's life, while others argue it cause more harm than good. In this essay, I w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: much research; a good deal of research
...on over the years. Obviously, there are many research point that mental and physical efficien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, lastly, look, so, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13513513514 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.814868433 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6310122164 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4117647059 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27797328298 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852180205746 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644049089196 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168283104793 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308190743782 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.