The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, Between 2000 and 2009.
The chart given elucidates the quantity of houses erected on a yearly basis between the year of 2000 and 2009 in the two cities, namely Derby and Nottingham.
Overall, Derby witnessed a stable and dramatic rise while the proportion of Nottingham showed a sharp fluctuation during the time frame.
The figure for Derby started as the second position in the first two years but in 2002, it rose to about 60 compared to approximately 10 of Nottingham. From then on, the proportion was ahead of its counterpart, ranging slightly from 110 to 120 in the next years. In 2008, the number of houses erected in Derby climbed considerably to more than 275 and ended the period at its peak for nearly 350.
At the beginning of the period, the houses built each year in Nottingham, about 50 houses, outnumbered those of Derby with a negligible gap. However, in 2003, Nottingham experienced a catastrophic drop to 20 in its figure. Then it started to go up steadily in the following years till 2005 before diving by 75 to practically 0 in 2006. Surprisingly, in the year after, the proportion soared to nearly 200, which was one hundred times as many as the previous one. Nevertheless, it dropped to approximately 10 in 2008, but then reached its peak at 250 at the end of the time frame.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-16 | rojababa | 100 | view |
| 2021-02-27 | sumitra gautam | 51 | view |
| 2021-02-04 | xuanhieu26 | 73 | view |
- The line graphs show the production and demand for steel in million stones and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 72
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the period at its peak for nearly 350. At the beginning of the period, the hous...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71555555556 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80710210399 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.2311092503 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.1 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281506368986 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104903148718 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117111138625 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193252703548 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126534988828 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.