In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one’s own family. Is it positive or negative development?
Who am I? Where did I come from? These questions are fascinating and intriguing to many people. It has been observed that there is an increasing trend where people are attempting to find out more about their family history. In this essay, I examine the push factors for such a phenomenon and discuss the benefits and drawbacks of this trend.
People are motivated to research about their family history for several reasons. Firstly, it is likely that they are curious on whether their ancestors were famous historical figures. This curiosity can be beneficial since people can learn more about their ethnic backgrounds. People could be more appreciative of their own cultures and roots. Secondly, with the invention of internet, people can easily conduct research or even sign up for online services to help trace the history of their great grandparents.
Knowing more about one’s family history can help to foster close-knitted relationships with the existing family members. From this perspective, this can help to improve one’s quality of life. Furthermore, a search of a global data base helps to identify and to contact long lost family lines around the world. However, the research process may not always be positive since historical data might be unavailable or inaccurate. People might also become upset if they find out that their ancestors were notorious criminals of their times.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that if one can engage the research process and the findings of one’s roots with an open mind, the pros of such an attempt outweigh the cons.
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one’s own family. Is it positive or negative development? 61
- Organised tour to remote community and other countries are increasingly popular. Is it positive or negative development for people and local environment? 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what way has Technology affected the type of relationship people make?Is this a positive or negative development? 89
- Most of people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial.To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21011673152 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6938156573 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587548638132 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8390165834 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6875 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133537058926 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406295118579 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041527274012 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832770739945 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055617828023 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.