In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one’s own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Humans’ aspiration to learn about the past has always been appealing to some demographics of society. An increasing number of people are interested in their ancestors and direct relatives. I believe that individuals who immerse into previous generations of the families may do so due to curiosity. And I reckon this is considered a positive trend since it may foster self-identity.
First of all, striving to ascertain what happened among their ancient relatives is supposed to be a new social trend since human beings possess vivid interest in their development. In other words, the questions of existence and being are regarded as highly fascinated to humans since the complexity of the latter. Therefore, not only prominent individuals provoke interest, but also close relatives of the past.
The desire to learn if someone genetically connected to you were famous or possessed some unique features is considered inherent in many of us. For example, a growing number of people crave to determine the origins by blood tests.
Furthermore, such a development may be regarded as beneficial as it raise awareness of the past, which in its turn facilitate the future. This is because, scientists reckon that the history is cyclical; therefore some events of the past are to recur in the next generations. Proceeding from this, when a person learns and establishes about the lives of their ancestors, they can draw conclusion of their behavior and what they achieved. Moreover, this projection helps provide assistance to make decisions in the contemporary world. For instance, a famous Russian writer Bulgakov being inspired by the lives of his ancestors left the big city to dwell in the rural areas as he had established that this is where his relatives lived.
To conclude, people tend to learn about the past generations due to vivid interest and this is considered a positive social trend due to the fact that the situations in the past may assist in solving the future
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2017-08-31 | luongbinh067 | 61 | view |
- There is no need to maintain a close relationship with distant relatives Do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods our communication and social abilities have taken a step back Why does technological advance hurt nontechnical co 89
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time Compare the benefits of planning free time activities with the benefits of not making plans Which do you prefer plannin 83
- Email is a fast and convenient way to communicate and written letters aren t needed anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 11
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All students should be required to study art and music in secondary school Use specific reasons to support your answer 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 69, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'raises'?
Suggestion: raises
...ent may be regarded as beneficial as it raise awareness of the past, which in its tur...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i reckon, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90445710181 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2737300648 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119583363957 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408343727725 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309068493736 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651232894089 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396293369476 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.