Some people argue that companies and private individuals, rather than governments, should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no denying that polluted environment is one of the pressing issues in this modern era. Some people believe that it is the duty of organizations and private individuals to pay to clear away the contamination that they have generated rather than the goverments. I totally advocate this opinion, and this essay will critically examine my view.
To begin with, businesses must pay taxes for the harm they have created to the environment. This may encourage these businesses to be more responsible and cautious in their behaviors, particularly when it comes to environmental problems. If governments do not enact this regulation and instead choose to disregard such corporations' wrongdoings, it will inevitably lead to apathy and an underestimation of the value of the environment. As a result, instead of amending their errors, they might continue to repeat the same acts in order to increase profits for their businesses. to shift people's attitudes on environmental issues.
Similarly, each individual must have an obligation to pay for clearing up environmental degradation. Many people in the modern era have a propensity to disregard their responsibility to protect the environment in which they live. That is why they throw rubbish everywhere, destroy forests, and use a great deal of pesticides on their farms, causing the environment to become extremely contaminated and hazardous. As a result, it is necessary and vital for the government to compel individuals to pay taxes in order to reduce pollution in the regions where we reside. And this, obviously, can make everyone aware of the need of conserving and safeguarding the environment, resulting in a greener, fresher, and healthier atmosphere.
To summarize, both companies and people must pay taxes to clean up the damage they have generated in the environment. This regulation may encourage them to be more responsible and cautious in their interactions with the environment, leading to a healthier ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-25 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-25 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | HanChann | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 577, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... increase profits for their businesses. to shift peoples attitudes on environmenta...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent, leading to a healthier ecosystem.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, similarly, so, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43130990415 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26452854918 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546325878594 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7176702909 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187132263117 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673638739975 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756773036768 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124824973672 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360596655903 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.