In the ever-changing environment of trendy vogue, the way every individual garment on a temporary basis is laid a deep emphasis on, which directly catalyzes the debate's polarization amongst fashionistas. A wide array of people leap to the conclusion that spending cash on the fashion field is absolutely no use; however, some point out the plus sides of a stylish investment, which is in contrast with the first group. From my standpoint, I am in favor of taking the side of the latter one.
In the light of how much money people need to pay off for a brand-new costume, which catches on at a particular time, it is by no means worthy. To be precise, the trendy cloth is synonymous with widening financial problems. Let alone the fact that a tight chain between hindrances of the monetary field has given rise to the rapidly non-stop buildup of crime. Take, for example, petty theft or pick pocketing, which undoubtedly poses a serious threat to innocent people and society as a whole, which has a root originally from a shortage of money for personal ironical interests.
Despite this supposed relevant evidence, controversy still reigns, and opinions clearly divided about this. Appropriate investing in fashion; having said that, has a mainstream of reaping numerous advantages, not to mention appears in varying fields. Just a fresh pair of eyes over an issue can help even a totally ignorant person make sense of the essence of vogue. Overwhelming evidence exists in support of a predisposition towards myriad bright sides. It cannot be denied that fashion plays a crucial role in the business of authorities as the prizes some genius contestants win are not without value, indeed. Further and even more importantly, garments are now and then come in handy on the grounds that it is a reliable safeguard to your constitution, especially in harsh weather conditions. On those accounts, it would not be too much of an exaggeration to say that style is something that is unable to be deficient in anyone's course of life.
To conclude, although fashion items and accessories may sometimes cost an arm and a leg, it seems to me that such high expenditure on outfits is satisfactory in terms of safeguarding and supporting finance
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Sunuwar_42
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'debates'' or 'debate's'?
Suggestion: debates'; debate's
...phasis on, which directly catalyzes the debates polarization amongst fashionistas. A wi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, still, then, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95466666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90452030845 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650666666667 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7993956261 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.866666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18971378553 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465119591189 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428564228884 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963967760491 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445421990977 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.