Some people beliebe that it is good to share to as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In today's world, due to the development of technology, people are able to share the vast amount of information. Even in science, business and academic world. Although some think that the openness in that fields is necessary for our lifestyle, I would urge general public not to intrude their research's freedom.
There is an opinion that the confidential documents are needed to allow citizens to access so that a person who contributes in making world peaceful, better and convenient could be recognized the effort. For example, there are many famous activists, artists, scientists who died not to be known because of poverty, pressure etc. If their contribution had been identified earlier, people would have lived in the more advanced community. Because of this, it is essential to be said prevalently regarding precious information.
However, on the other side of this argument, it must be remembered that the research materials could be used in different intention, unlike the expert's one. For instance, Albert Einstein invented the theory of relativity which resulted in developing an atomic bomb. Furthermore, there may be a possibility not to ensure the professionals' privacy. Alan Turing, who is the father of computer science. At that time, England did not recognize homosexuality so his great work was hidden just because of his privacy. Thus this makes it clear why sharing the information leads to significant danger both our world and individual.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for against the permission of crucial report by distributing whoever they are. But I convinced that since they have discretionary power, people should not spread highly classified data as they please.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- Some people beliebe that it is good to share to as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. discuss both these views an 89
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 77
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie chart below shows the results of a survey of the causes of poor learning outcomes in schools in a particular country in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 42
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 91
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...cessary for our lifestyle, I would urge general public not to intrude their researchs freedom....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alently regarding precious information. However, on the other side of this argum...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professionals'' or 'professional's'?
Suggestion: professionals'; professional's
... may be a possibility not to ensure the professionals privacy. Alan Turing, who is the father...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ather of computer science. At that time, England did not recognize homosexuality ...
^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...was hidden just because of his privacy. Thus this makes it clear why sharing the inf...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35424354244 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94222541702 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667896678967 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4940976717 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185101475057 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546344488681 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467065506271 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099334394226 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552587551985 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.