Some people believe that charity organisations should help people wherever they live, others think they should attend their countries only.
Discuss both and give your opinion
Some think charity organisations should help the people regardless of where they live, while others believe that they should help the people in their originating country. In my opinion charity organisations should help all the people while giving priority to their own country.
On one hand, charity organisations in developed countries such as USA, Canada, UK have much funds to help beyond their country and while doing that eventually diplomatic relationships between countries will improve. Another reason is that Helping poor countries in need. As an example, developing countries like Africa, Ethiopia or Syria can benefit from such organisations to aid people to improve their medical services, water purification and aid for hunger.
On the other hand, while limiting the charity work to their own country will avoid risking any diplomatic or political issues, such as immigration problems while sending medical equipment and building shelters. Another benefit of prioritising their country people will help significantly improving the essential services within country. As an example, in every country there are homeless people and people who have in need of food and medical support, by focusing on these people, organisations can quickly address these issues.
In conclusion, I believe governments needs to engage in the operations of such organisations, so that the political and diplomatic issues can be minimised while improving the charity organisations reach. In my opinion charity organisations should give more weight to their citizens while helping others in need, by doing so not only their citizens get benefit but also the people in need in developing countries.
- in spite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.why is this the case?what can be done about this problem? 61
- In some countries criminal trials are shown on television for the public Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 88
- In some countries criminal trials are shown on television for the public Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how tit will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some students found some subjects such as mathematics Philosophy are difficult so these subjects should be optional instead of compulsory To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (UK) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...loped countries such as USA, Canada, UK have much funds to help beyond their country...
^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... countries such as USA, Canada, UK have much funds to help beyond their country and ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 333, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ing others in need by doing so not only the their citizen get benefit but also the people...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people in need in developing countries.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58301158301 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89237383286 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517374517375 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.380405442 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.666666667 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7777777778 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415110681671 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206193875401 0.084324248473 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162569603274 0.0667982634062 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289284228434 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175135102929 0.056905535591 308% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.68 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.