Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students’ performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
It is a common belief that judging pupils' progress by exams is a flawed method in terms of its insignificant effect and the lack of objectivity in the rating, and continuous evaluation should take the role as a procedure instead. From my perspective, I completely agree with this viewpoint and shall provide the reasons for it.
First of all, after a semester, students tend to memorize only the contents required for the examination, not all the lectures, with no creativity just to cover up knowledge gaps to get flying colors sloppily and deceitfully. As a result, pupils may easily forget what they have learned when the test is finished and there will be no benefit for their futures and knowledge. According to a recent survey, Singapore and various countries have announced that they will abolish midterm tests or even all the tests. Thus, continuous assessment - an appropriate way of measuring students’ that focuses on comprehensive training effort, the quality, and capacity of students should be vigorously applied.
In addition to the reason above, I also believe that while consecutive ratings help students to build cooperation, prizing a student by exams may increase the emulation and peer pressure between them. Consequently, scholars may be more introverted, easily want to get out of school, and have mental health issues such as depression, illness, stress, etc. Furthermore, friendships will be on the rocks and get frictions or rifts in relationships because of busyness and rivalry. For example, in numerous schools, students with high scores are arranged to sit in front-row seats, while the lower ones are opposite may lead to a lack of interaction and mutual competition.
To conclude, I strongly believe that continuous assessment is more beneficial than examinations because it helps students improve their qualities, capacities and build cooperation. Government and the Ministry of Education should use that specific measure to solve the drawbacks of exams in order to promote the future of people's education.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-10-09 | too3ig | 89 | view |
2022-09-24 | heyimmehak@gmail.com | 89 | view |
2022-09-24 | devanshgera8@gmail.com | 56 | view |
2022-09-24 | devanshgera8@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2022-09-24 | devanshgera8@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- Some people think watching movies is a waste of time Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think it is more important to plant more trees in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 78
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainme Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it. First of all, after a semester, students tend to memorize only the conte...
^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings help students to build cooperation, prizing a student by exams may increase ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99262050965 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.8789967577 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242203063086 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792428355825 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069504387997 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135186165219 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295049226117 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.