Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It goes without saying traffic congestion is a fundamental issue all over the globe and requires modern and smart ways to be solved.
Wider roads should be constructed by countries in order to declining traffic congestion. Although, it is likely that public funds might be used in another better way such as promoting train and subway lines to decreasing traffic jam.

When public budgets, in order to shrink traffic congestion, are used to development of wider ways such as streets, highways, bridges and all subcategories, it is considering as policymakers’ respect to public demands.

Moreover, these plans are executable throughout far-away locations like rural areas. In this point, in the northern part of India, the suburban roads have been built in rural districts are the main and the solely paths for local dwellers to access the main cities.

Is it possible that with all merits which roads possess for governments, we looking for another beneficial way? This is a simple question that summarizes the answer in a short sentence: the subway and railroad's promotion.
Trains offer an efficient way to move commodities over long distances. They are reliable, fast and cheap for governments as well as the majority of people such as merchants and ordinary individuals. With capable of moving huge and heavy goods, instead of using trucks, trains play an important role to reduce traffic congestion.

Being faster compared to roads, steel-highways are environmental-friendly either.
For instance, in order to induce people to use subways and trains instead of personal vehicles, Japanese experts unveiled an electrical train which could reach a high speed of 500 Km/h and this is a stunning achievement.

On balance, from my point of view the superiority of train and metro promoting than roads expanding is clear in reduction of traffic congestion. Nonetheless, if I was in charge of a country, I would extend roads besides subway lines simultaneously.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sing traffic jam. When public budgets ,in order to shrink traffic congestion, a...
^^
Line 10, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tant role to reduce traffic congestion. Being faster compared to roads, steel-hi...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32484076433 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08404591444 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2988103842 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258357866702 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805154732526 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065294705621 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985001542493 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782198359916 0.056905535591 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.