Some people believe government should spend money on building trains and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider road is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
It is obvious that traffic congestion happens at a high frequency in cities. While some people suppose government should invest money on upgrading the quality of road systems, I agree with those who think the construction of trains and subway lines is a better idea to reduce traffic jams.
On the one hand, there are strong reasons to think that building new and wider roads will alleviate traffic congestion. Firstly, the existing roads are obviously inadequate to deal with the growing volume of traffic, especially in city center. As many cities are extended now, people live in outskirt have to use car to commute to work, so new roads must be constructed to meet the demands of the increasing number of cars. Secondly, even in the outsides of cities, there are more and more traffic congestion. Therefore, new roads are essential for people to reach their destination without facing the problem of traffic jams.
On the other hand, some people argue that the construction of rails and subway lines would be a much more effective solution to reduce traffic jams. Firstly, more people are encouraged to leave their cars at home and commute to work faster by metro. Therefore, the amount of traffic on the roads would decrease significantly. Secondly, it is sometimes impossible to build new and wider roads, especially in big cities, since land is rarely available for such development. As the result, metro networks, built underground, seems to be a more practical solution.
In conclusion, I believe that government should spend on building trains and subways line rather than building or widening roads in order to reduce traffic congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | MOHETH CHOWDARI | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Lynn2309 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Dao Thu Ha | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09558823529 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69345572077 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.939990721 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.615384615 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45188586663 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15383556524 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133452647292 0.0667982634062 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310830368505 0.151304729494 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109396166258 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.