Some people believe the government should spend money building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others, however, think that building more
Whether the its own value. Notwithstanding erecting train and subway lines helps encourage people to use more public transport, creating modern roads and expanding old ones could tackle urgently rush hour traffic problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-17 | duongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-14 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-12 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-12 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-12 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
- The diagram describes the process of coffee production 67
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 67
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templetion between 1990 and 2005 78
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 87
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: train
... huge amount of funding in constructing train train and subway ways ignites a heated debate...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Therefore
...owing to their convenience and comfort. There fore, investing more budget in erecting trai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20596205962 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65723374036 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520325203252 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2246776633 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358130875967 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111235081895 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878898283231 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216266280883 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559505648888 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: train
... huge amount of funding in constructing train train and subway ways ignites a heated debate...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Therefore
...owing to their convenience and comfort. There fore, investing more budget in erecting trai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20596205962 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65723374036 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520325203252 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2246776633 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358130875967 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111235081895 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878898283231 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216266280883 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559505648888 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.