Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Depending on the individual's choice, hobbies can be either easy or hard. In the leisure time, some people enjoy doing simple hobbies which need less physical or mental stress, and others love to challenge themselves. While I accept that easy hobbies can be fun, I would argue that the more challenged we do, the more enjoyable moments we have in life.
On the one hand, many people enjoy easier entertaining activities. This is because they don't feel like hazardous, and these hobbies do not require demanding experience. An example of this activity that is easy for most people is singing. It does not need any equipment, and individuals can sing whenever they want. It can be great fun for those people. Another hobby that I believe exciting and frugal is reading. In my opinion, reading can grip anyone with an amazing tale, they can choose to lose themselves in a fictional world or learn more about their own world. Despite being straightforward, reading is a good way to relax people's mind.
On the other hand, to create many great memories, some individuals love to do something escape from the busy daily life and want to challenge themselves crossing their limitations. For instance, playing guitar is a hobby that requires lots of patience and practice. I remember learning to play guitar when I was a beginner, my fingers hurt all the time because of sharp strings and it was really hard to understand tabs, but now I am truly passionate about the guitar. Not only does playing guitar calms me down when I am stressed out, but composing tunes on my own can also provide me creative satisfaction. I believe that some hobbies should be physically or mentally challenged because the feeling achievement is happier and greater.
In conclusion, easy hobbies can be fun and relaxing, but difficult hobbies can make our life's moments more memorable and enjoyable.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
2020-01-29 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
2020-01-29 | torontoontario | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 61
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- The chart below shows the number of travelers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...aining activities. This is because they dont feel like hazardous, and these hobbies ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90851735016 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68109480676 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586750788644 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0695732838 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5294117647 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252514934287 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873916540214 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652940790243 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171197496299 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460491239323 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.