Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Recently, there has been a controversy of whether information in terms of scientific, business and academic realms should be publicized or not as some of them is of paramount importance and invaluable. Although both schools of thought hold a value of accuracy, I personally lean towards the latter idea
On the one hand, if there was so much limitation finance-wise in accessing these genres of information, fewer breakthroughs would be generated since not everyone can pay money to acquire them. Indeed, discoveries may not be used as their full potential at the first place so if more people are being acknowledged about this, there will be more inventions and ideas, some of which can even be ground-breaking and unexpectedly become scientific breakthroughs. For example, if the information revolving around a kind of virus that caused skin cancer had been off the record, human would still have had to suffer from this disorder till these days since the doctor discovered this illness’s treatment was not the one who found the mentioned virus
On the other hand, scientists are demotivated to stick with their research while they have to live on a budget. In fact, some information is generated from endless effort and hours dedicated by the professionals, which is immensely ironic if they do not receive any profit in return. Also, this can lead them not only to have to cope with financial issues on a daily basis but also in their scientific, business and academic areas. In addition, it would be problematic to remain the balance between occupation and life as they do not earn sufficient income to buy necessary equipment and technology for their work, they will have to prioritize their social lives as it is more essential. Thus, sharing information excessively without any limitation can contribute to many serious shortcomings
To conclude, although the idea of sharing information widely and freely is still in an intensive debate because while some claim that this can be beneficial for the society, others suppose it decreases the establishment of future innovations. From my perspective, I highly endorse the view that information should be spread with careful considerations and not every kind of them can be publicized without any charge
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot the one who found the mentioned virus On the other hand, scientists are demoti...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17119565217 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00112096063 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.2975951904 197% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.3758324861 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 211.444444444 106.682146367 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.8888888889 20.7667163134 197% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4444444444 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228088026042 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941542950196 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595259296439 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146159031511 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039528767724 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.4 13.0946893788 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.88 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.1190380762 178% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.