Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Following think that details in the educational, technical and economic world should be exchanged widely while opponents support the reverse. Although I recognize that the data distribution among people is increasingly common, I think that such vital facts and figures must be kept confidential.
The free flow of academic information is believed to offer interests to both individuals and society. For individuals, the acquisition of these data without payment facilitates their career and life paths. To illustrate, students can obtain considerably free knowledge on the Internet to draw on their study and research. Circulating information will also assist humans to update the latest statistics and upgrade the intellectual. For instance, inventions in the medical field need to be published widely because this is helpful for patients to take care of themselves more carefully. In addition, the method to grow organic food or to keep healthy lifestyles can benefit the community if broadcast freely.
However, some crucial and influential information spread that might result in certain drawbacks to the public. For instance, creators who do not derive benefits from their dedicated innovations might have no incentive to work harder. In the business field, the company must cover confidential information against the exploitation of other competitors. In addition, the free spreading of some data might be harmful to humans. For example, via the instructions on how to make firecrackers on websites that children can provoke potential disaster when making them. Accordingly, not all information should be free to access unless there is permission.
In conclusion, freely data dividing can bring huge advantages to users in certain aspects whereas this can be detrimental as well. Therefore, I strongly believe that some critical and precious material should be protected strictly instead of public and pro bono sharing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 78
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred. 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60409556314 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02440692365 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648464163823 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0290114111 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185350781763 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585054602263 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498574999267 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981756257577 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279182184934 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.