Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both the views and give our opinion.
Sharing information leads to awareness. It brings quality, ameliorates productivity, and boosts team spirit. However, a group of people believes that some information needs to be kept in discreet. I would like to present my views in this essay in the following paragraphs.
Someone has rightly said, “Power is gained by sharing knowledge and not by hoarding it.” The more we share the better we become. For instance, an academic related information shared by teachers to students, can enhance the teaching- learning process. Eventually, the students become more confident and perform well. The same applies to other fields too. Scientific Research based information such as Invention of any drug, can help doctors to provide medical aid to their patients. Similarly, Information associated to business can guide the investors regarding the profit and loss of the same.
Nevertheless, there are oodles of reasons where some segment of data needs to be in concealment. It cannot be publicized openly. To illustrate, information that can be threat to a country or can hamper the progress of economy needs to keep confidential. Army officials have to keep the information guarded regarding their plans to deal with the terrorist activities. Similarly, in academic field, question paper setters do not have to disclose the questions they have asked in the examination as this will put the evaluation system in doldrums. In the same way, some secrets of business are necessary to keep under the carpet to avoid any gains to a competitor.
To sum up, even though, sharing of knowledge brings prosperity, improves efficiency, and lift morale but there are some indispensable facts that requires to be in closet for smooth functioning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both the views and giv 67
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is iniquitous. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 78
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities, which are played alone. To what extent to you agree or disagree? 78
- PIE CHART ON DIFFERENT EXPENDITURES ON MOVIE 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...nts, can enhance the teaching- learning process. Eventually, the students become more c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, well, for instance, such as, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99271853157 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6397343446 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5882352941 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297319807324 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836344659903 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663550588283 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162142642194 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552157702476 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.