Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
The modern world is enshrouded into an informational noise. It is said that one should reveal all information that one possesses related to science and business. Albeit others deem that some specific pieces of information are too significant to be unveiled. The essay supports the first opinion and discusses both views.
Sharing of information has always been a paramount activity of an individual. By imparting of information, it is possible to preserve humans’ knowledge for centuries. Moreover, after a publication of all of the available data, there is a very little chance for something vital to be lost. One biological experiment provides a clear example. Scientists carried out an experiment related to some disease, and during research, a lot of data was marked as ‘noise’, and was omitted during analysis, though that ‘noise’ was shared to scientific community. Two years later, in that ‘noise’ other team of researchers found a very important information concerning a chicken pox. Had it not been for the team, the humanity would have lost a plethora of information about the deadly ailment. Thus, one can say that one pearson’s noise is another’s data.
But what if the information is such as it can be used in evil aims? For instance, an information about nuclear research or biochemical weapon? Surely, it must not be published. However, we can think that if some government’s establishment will take care about possibly dangerous data, the data will not be given into wrong arms. For example, the information about nuchear reactors is now being exchanged between different scientific institutes in Russia under control of the authorities, and so far there was not even one accident of leakage. Hance, essential data can be protected.
In conclusion, revealing of all available data is vital the science, business and society, though the information unveiled might be a little bit dangerous. If we take care about who uses that data, we will not have any problems with freely sharing of information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 56
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources.To what extend do you agree? 89
- The graph shows the consumption of four types of diary products in the USA 86
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...uries. Moreover, after a publication of all of the available data, there is a very little ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ugh the information unveiled might be a little bit dangerous. If we take care about who us...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32721712538 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27488241166 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584097859327 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7720725874 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.35 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219637424293 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697327538816 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526351179693 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142900897429 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526321744728 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.