Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In this competitive world sharing details of a process continues to be a controversial topic. While there are persuasive arguments in favour of the free flow of information, I would argue that it is better to keep some critical information in a secret way.
On the one hand, those who enthusiastic about the outbreak of knowledge would claim that in this occasion individuals have the opportunity to flourish their creativity and in addition boost the pace of one’s research process. Furthermore, a vast majority of businessmen would have achieved success if wealthy and renown traders had shared the details of their work. Finally, some people would assume that by the free share of scientific data, the potential of enhancing the knowledge for academic society would have risen, as it can be seen in Green Lab, where the pace of success inevitably continues to grow.
On the other hand, it is universally accepted that revelation of extremely arcane information leads to some irreversible dire consequences. First and foremost, for some continues projects if they share their processes’ detail there will be a high incidence of plagiarism, which could be disastrous in some cases. Secondly, some trades related information are of paramount importance for a trader. Therefore, if they broadcast their way of trade and its details they will face some threats. Lastly, as a result of existing different ways for an academic research, sharing any method can bring about some indeterminacies.
By and large, notwithstanding the fact that creativity flourishes where there is a free flow of information, I am of the opinion that some details are highly critical and vulnerable to be shared.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 82
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods, reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport discuss both thes 90
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a secret way" with adverb for "secret"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...etter to keep some critical information in a secret way. On the one hand, those who enthusia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, as a result, by and large, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26373626374 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08992977415 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556776556777 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0663911838 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.636363636 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4545454545 7.06120827912 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232996664182 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966171931571 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463551931694 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134506435622 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628904427361 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.