In this modern era, sharing information is something that is commonly done between people. Some people opine that it is acceptable to share information where others opine that information should be protected. I completely agree with both views and will explain the reasons.
On the one side, information should be shared to help others progressing. Some people may need information that we have in order to accomplish something. Hence, if we share these information to them, they will be able to get what they want to achieve. For instance, a thesis advisor has done research in the same topic with what her thesis student chooses. In order to help her thesis student to finish her thesis, she shared the information about her research as a reference. Consequently, this information has helped her thesis student to finish his thesis faster.
However, there should be a limitation about which information is allowed to be shared freely. Some information are hard to obtain, thus it is best to protect them from being misused by other unwanted people. By protecting this information, the value of this information won't be decreased, and the owner of this information will feel respected. For example, someone has done a research about the effect of playing games to working performance among Canada employees. Because the information about this topic is still rare and he done that research with a lot of efforts, he wants to protect this information by making this journal a paid-version journal. Those who are really interested about this information can pay and read about his journal, so the information won't be shared carelessly.
In conclusion, sharing information is good because it can help others progressing, but for some information that are hard to obtain, the best way to do with them is by protecting them.
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 65
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...ccomplish something. Hence, if we share these information to them, they will be able to get what ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...d to be shared freely. Some information are hard to obtain, thus it is best to prot...
^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...espected. For example, someone has done a research about the effect of playing games to wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, really, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09666666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86474935883 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1338701842 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290407754599 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120752959564 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683654967907 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213550527631 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393862923185 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.