Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, as the science develops, researches done in diverse sectors leads to advanced level of information and data in different subjects. The vast majority of people emphasizes that the this information has to be shared with public but opponents claim that the researches done by any professors might be so essential so that it can not be distributed freely. There are valid arguments on both sides of this issue which I will discuss now.
Let’s begin by looking at importance of shearing information among population. Firstly, if all the researches done in science, new innovations in business world or in academic world are shared by people, it is beneficial to society to know what happens in the world and what further developments and advances can be seen for the foreseeable future. Moreover, information about newly found innovations might attract some people so that some of them can immerse in new researches and even their attendance on such research might be beneficial.
Turning to the other side of the argument, it is noteworthy that some researches have to be in secret. The reason is that new findings can not be approved by population. Furthermore, such kind of researches might carry crucial importance through worldwide which can not be announced to people. Beside that, if the theory that has been developed by professor but not yet patented is shared with public, then somebody can copy his idea simply which means this idea has been stolen.
Considering all things, it is obvious that shearing information with people has advantageous effects while its drawbacks overweight it benefits. Personally, I believe that the information might be shared with people if and only if it can be accepted by people and all the ideas have been patented by professor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-25 | Mr. Fithroni | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that there are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both sides and give your own opi 56
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people in Great Britain living alone by age and sex in 2004 and 2005 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...vast majority of people emphasizes that the this information has to be shared with publi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, then, while, as to, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1228668942 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86936753378 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529010238908 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1218139851 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.083333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290877981751 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104655574511 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591264795165 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180915160804 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422597641133 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.