Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Globalisation, along with the application of digital technology, has facilitated the information sharing among academics and businesspeople, regardless of nationality and whereabouts. I agree that the easy access to valuable information can foster innovation and address some problems worldwide, despite the risk that some information can be misused.
We can find solutions to problems easily if we have unlimited access to different databases, such as those which contain information about how to cure diseases, prevent famines and alleviate air pollution. This kind of knowledge is not adequately possessed by people living in some poorest sections of the world, and this is why they are still afflicted by some preventable diseases and problems that can otherwise be avoided.
Some people have a conservative attitude towards this because they are afraid that their knowledge and intellectual properties can be exploited. This is particularly understandable in the business world, where companies are not willing to place information about their managerial skills, software and patented products on the Internet. Their competitiveness would be undermined if their global competitors could acquire such information.
I would, however, view this issue in a positive light. While it is up to business owners to decide what information should be withheld, they should exchange their ideas with their peers in the same industry. It can create an atmosphere worldwide, in which designers, inventors and engineers can mine each other’s information with permissions and come up with creative solutions, without having to advance their research alone through trial and error.
In conclusion, it may not be practical to require all people to give up the ownership of their essential knowledge, but they should accept that sharing in a globalised world is better than concealing information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64912280702 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16867555466 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.273347809 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.363636364 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226833368711 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858712477936 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553135606937 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131353385757 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585179830798 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.