Some people believe that it’s not necessary to have internet access to live a full life. What is your opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
In the past few decades, lifestyle has tremendously changed because of technological advancements. Internet, like many other important household things, has become an essential product in every home. However, some people argue that internet need not exist in our lives to live a purposeful life. I completely agree with this statement. This essay will discuss why internet is not a necessity to lead a meaningful life.
Firstly, internet access does not always bring us joy that one looks forward to. It is certain that online access gives us information that we need and helps to complete our work in a more efficient manner. However, the internet does not redefine joy. Surprisingly, internet may not always provide joy a human being can bring. For instance, there are many grandparents who seek happiness by looking after their grandchildren. Some of them do not have internet access at homes, but they are content with lives by interacting with people they know. Hence, it is certain that being connected with the world via internet is not necessary all the time to live a peaceful life.
Secondly, children in remote villages do not have the means to be connected with the world. Does this mean they are not leading a happy life? Even though they may not have the luxury of internet or other technological devices at home, they grow up to be children who seek happiness in other forms. They learn about the world through their surroundings. When they play with other young children, they learn to be more kind and compassionate. Without internet access, they become caring citizens and passionate learners who live a joy-filled life.
In conclusion, interacting with human beings and learning from our environment bring more joy that internet does not give all the time. Given this situation, we can all learn to live a completely meaningful life without depending on other devices for true happiness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | gayaclav1973 | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | manpreet kaurs | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08227848101 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74196032408 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541139240506 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1056265007 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157381849486 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532928061976 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468427951381 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108140382763 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336895054159 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.