Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, it is undeniable that people have several choices, from personal needs to public demands. Some people may feel it would be a significant change because they have multiselection, while others will have adverse thinking about such development. Personally, I do believe that having too many options may not be a good change.
First and foremost, standing between many choices may lead humans to confusion or indecision. It can be obviously seen that these days, in every aspect, people are forced to make decisions among numerous choices, which causes challenges to them as they do not know what option is the best one, and in some cases, they might keep it blank since it is hard to select. Take an example from the case of when a person tends to purchase a new, updated smartphone. Surprisingly, when searching on the internet, there are more than five mobile phone brands existing out there, such as Iphone, Samsung, Oppo, Bphone, etcetera. Consequently, this diversity makes people confused a lot and makes them hard to choose a good and fit one, or in much worse, they make the decision not to change their phone.
In addition, this change may cause some negative effects on resident’s health. With the development of information technology, everyone will have many more opportunities to reach different sources of information. As a result, some people will try to access as many sources as possible since they are scared of being out-of-date, or it can be called fear of missing out symptoms. The result of this disease will not show up immediately as it is a kind of mental illness. If a patient is in this situation for a long time, he might be depressed sooner or later owing to trying his best to gain more knowledge than others in the community.
To summarize, while it may be good to have several choices for every aspect, I fully see it is not a positive idea, at least in this era, to have numerous options, which may lead to confusion or harmful impacts on human mental health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people think that sports in schools is a waste of time and resources while others believe it is a vital part of education Discuss both of these views and give your opinion 73
- People eat more processed food than they did in the past Why is this What are the effects of this 67
- A large number of deaths are caused by road accidents Why do so many road accidents occur Make recommendations that would help to reduce the number of road accidents 89
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, so, while, at least, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79656160458 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67659814578 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558739255014 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2453172654 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183218628995 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660112876131 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635786112745 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118402812809 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649441285262 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, so, while, at least, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79656160458 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67659814578 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558739255014 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2453172654 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183218628995 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660112876131 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635786112745 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118402812809 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649441285262 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.