Nowadays with the development of technology and the increasing globalized tendency, people have a variety of choices either for their daily life or work. Some people think that we have so many choices that it’s difficult for us to make a decision, which I don’t agree.
Some people have strong advocacy that the choices that we own today in our every day life have an adverse impact. For example, we used to have only one choice for an item. But now, there are too many brands in front of us. In order to attract our attention, companies bombard us with endless advertisements.
People also have too many choices for their career. Unlike our parents with only a few job opportunities, we have a range of employment-possibility. With the development of technology and economy, many new jobs come up. Young people may be confused about their future, as there are too many possibilities and their parents and teacher can only afford them with very few advertises.
However, on the other hand, more choices bring about more opportunities. People can improve their life standard and live in a better life, if they make good use of the choices occur in their life. For example, people can sample more food, which can benefit their health and enable them to enjoy better life.
In my view, there are many choices but never enough or even too much. More choices can even help us to better understand ourselves, when we make a decision among varied choices. From commercial side, the competition among different products push there productors to cut prices. It is beneficial to customers, because they can spend less on some products essential to their lives such as food and the cost of living will decline.
It is therefore reasonable to think that we do have a lot of choices, but they are not over needed. People can have a variety of life and consumers can buy something at a lower cost, although people may have to spend more time to make a decision.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choicesTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80882352941 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70986120509 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523529411765 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1645845367 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0526315789 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226170153352 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831703624184 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546989864988 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136513810683 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671998113278 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.