Quite a few people hold the belief that we have a greater number of choices in the present day than we did in the past. In my opinion, I agree that we do have far too many options (more than we care to admit) now as opposed to before.
Take, for example, food: the most basic of necessities. A wide (and still expanding) variety is available for people of all ages, colors, ethnicities, etc. Nowadays, most capital cities in the world have an endless number of restaurants, which cater to different peoples' dietary or even religious preferences, be it vegetarian, gluten-free, Halal or kosher. Even once-simple categories such as drinks or dessert now come with their own menus! Yet it doesn't stop there, as humans continue to experiment with different types of cuisines, the list of picks will certainly grow.
Perhaps a more fundamental yet underappreciated aspect of life in which we have a large number of options than we did previously is healthcare. The rapid advancements in medical science and medical technology have given us a wide range of selections for not just locating and diagnosing maladies, but also dealing with them, from simple diseases such as influenza and the common cold, to even the more dangerous forms of cancer or AIDS. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that “more is not always better”. For instance, due to a large number of antibiotics prescribed for simple, self-containing illnesses, certain bacteria have gained resistance and are not affected anymore.
In conclusion, I concur that we do have a multitude of choices in the modern day, and while most of the time this bodes well, other times it may not.
- Some people believe that children s leisure activities must be educational otherwise they are a complete waste of time Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 56
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 100
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 78
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t now come with their own menus! Yet it doesnt stop there, as humans continue to exper...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eciated aspect of life in which we have a large number of options than we did previously is healt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ways better'. For instance, due to a large number of antibiotics prescribed for simple, self...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9605734767 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91891860386 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620071684588 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5944756229 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.818181818 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169916411688 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634507434017 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688248204819 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114208331988 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765200961041 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.