Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas. Whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both and give your opinion.
Although, some people are of the view that traveling in some areas should be restricted to preserve local culture, while others opine that it is useless to stop tourism as change is constant. Before my personal opinion finalizes the whole discussion, I would like to have an independent analysis of both the views.
On one hand, some people believe that preserving local culture requires to restrain tourist in some areas. They feel this way because tourist heavily influences the language of native people. In other words, the local person starts to speak a foreign language in order to communicate with travelers. Consequently, native children start to focus on adopting a new language rather than their own language. For instance, the children in touristy areas start to speak a foreign language as they see their elders talking in another language.
On the other hand, it is considered by some that restricting tourism is a wastage besides this the only constant thing is change. I agree with this view, change is unavoidable, banning tourists from some areas is worthless, as the native has other means through which they observed and learn other culture such as television and the internet. Furthermore, the hospitality industry is closely related to the economy of a country and it impacts negatively on the financial status of the country if it is completely banned. Owing to this fact, the tourism industry not only generates profit but also support other sectors as well. This can be exemplified by the recent survey conducted by Queen’s University, concluded that tourism directly co-relates with the per capita income of the tour regions.
In conclusion, despite, people having a different view, I believe that the only permanent thing is change and eliminating tourist from certain areas is not a vital solution to preserve the culture. However, in the future to protect the native culture government should emphasis on promoting the culture by conducting the cultural festivals.
- On nearly all science courses at university there are significantly more male students than female students What is the reason for this What could be done to balance out the number 51
- Some people say that music is a good way to bring people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- The population of most cities is growing as people move to cities to find work and new opportunities. What problem does over population in cities cause? How can these problems be solved? 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? (how to do IELTS) 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ourism as change is constant. Before my personal opinion finalizes the whole discussion, I would...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'restraining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: restraining
... that preserving local culture requires to restrain tourist in some areas. They feel this w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21981424149 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73999230325 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551083591331 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5325363286 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275727380617 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869259154675 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875426503903 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1652771851 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781964402341 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.