Some people believe that the radio is the best way to get news, while others believe that TV is better for this purpose. Discus both views and give your opinion

Around the world, it is very common to find TVs and radios as major means of getting news. The contest, however, is which of these two is most effective when it comes to getting news. Of these two types of devices, the radio and the TV, I believe the best way to access news is through the radio. I will share my reasons which are based on facts.

Firstly, radios are extensively smaller in size than TVs and this portability encourages owners to carry their radios everywhere they go. Since the same news contents are shared on radio and TV, it then becomes much easier and faster to get news from the radio, especially for people who are in transit.

On another note, for car owners and public transport drivers, radio is a major source of news because car manufactures install radios in cars. Therefore, when people are in transit, they could easily tune into radio stations to get current news. Unlike the radio, which disseminates only the voice of the news caster, the TV shows live pictures of the presenters or news casters. This then potentially poses a risk of distraction for the driver should TVs be installed in vehicles.

Further more, radios require less technicality, as compared with the TV, with respect to installation and first use. Additionally, radios come at much cheaper price. Consequently, it is owned by a lot more people than those that own TVs due to affordability.

In conclusion, finding news on time is most effective using the radio than the TV.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns which are based on facts. Firstly, radios are extensively smaller in size t...
^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: smaller
...ts. Firstly, radios are extensively smaller in size than TVs and this portability encourage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79457364341 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58524807353 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1929767978 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275377469281 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974254016391 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696838360812 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155282874228 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055610784669 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.