Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people, while others say that technology has the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some individuals opine that technology plays a key role in creating discrimination between people from different backgrounds. However, I believe that the advancement in technology has brought poorer and wealthier to the same level. In this essay, I will delve into both viewpoints.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why certain individuals think that technology creates inequality between people. One of the predominant reasons is that technology comes with various prizes. In other words, the phone technology comes with lower and upper prizes. Thus, the upper level of technology can only be affordable for the wealthier. This scenario sometimes makes a distinction between people with different financial backgrounds. Moreover, the expensive technology can also affect the day-to-day life of poor and affluent individuals. For instance, a faster car gives a hassle-free experience to those who have adequate money. Richer, therefore, can be more productive. However, poor people can not enjoy this benefit simply because they do not have a sufficient budget to purchase such an invaluable car.
On the other hand, I believe that technological innovations help to mitigate the growing inequality between people. nowadays, it is noticeable that there is a big fall in the value of technological equipment. For example, smartphones, computers, and the internet have shown a reduction in their costs. Therefore, people from poor conditions find no difficulty buying modern gadgets and making their lives advanced.
To sum up, there is no doubt that technology differentiates the people as it provides a more convenient life to the affluent, however, it seems to me that it has eliminated the gap between people with different financial conditions by offering products with various values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Lee Daisy | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | Ivellelidddddd | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | Manvir singh | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | dinhtuan2201200104112000 | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information on consume spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The table and notes below give information about student enrolment at Brighton co ed secondary school in 1990 2000 and 2010
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Nowadays the media is paying a lot of attention to the life stories of famous people in fields such as cinema sports and modeling What are the reasons for this Do u think it is a positive or negative trend 73
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job on the other hand other people think that getting experiences and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mes with various prizes. In other words, the phone technology comes with lower an...
^^
Line 6, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
... the growing inequality between people. nowadays, it is noticeable that there is a big f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, no doubt, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53068592058 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05138945343 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.767082891 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1176470588 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297519776254 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08693832772 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584792966478 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19054451172 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233505911341 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.