Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, books, TV programmes and video games are considered as some of the most popular recreational activities among kids. Of all these activities, reading book is advocated to be the most advantageous for the youngsters. From a personal perspective, I would take a dim view of this opinion owing to the fact that each activity has its own positive aspects.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that books are instrumental in enhancing children’s creativity and imagination. By reading stories, children have to use their imagination to visualize all events described by words in a book, hence, continuously creating a fantasy world in mind stimulate children’s neural development. In view of these facts, children that are bookworms find themselves better at critical thinking as well as decision making. The second point that should be taken into consideration is the more books children read, the higher their language acquisition ability will be since youngsters are given the opportunity to be exposed to a wide range of vocabularies and grammar structures. It is also noticeable that books play an indispensable role in the success of many outstanding individuals throughout human’s history, Uncle Ho, Elson Musk, Bill Gates to name a few.
Meanwhile, we should not take the benefits of video games and TV programmes for granted. There are a growing number of TV programmes providing significant lessons for juveniles nowadays, ranging from table manner to adequate behaviours in some particular situations. Children having access to these videos are more likely to develop good personalities from a young age. It is not to mention that children can cultivate leadership and cooperation skills when they play computer games with friends as game settings required not only highly cooperation between players but also the ability to be a team leader in some cases. Furthermore, the use of these electronic devices on a daily basis can improve youngsters’ technological literacy, which is widely recognized as one of the most crucial demand in the digital world’s workforce.
In conclusion, I completely disapprove with the writer’s viewpoint in consideration of plentiful advantages that both perspectives bring about for children’s developments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 73
- The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 84
- Some people think that organizing international sport events is good for the host country while others think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and who should takes responsibility 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 780, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an indispensable role in the success of many outstanding individuals throughout ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48587570621 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45662534877 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618644067797 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0914286469 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.714285714 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230512106772 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731688694605 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344652296994 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121087546988 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450906583871 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.