The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given maps shed lights on the development of a city for the time being compared to its previous arrangement in 1950.
As can be seen from the map, the town has gone through a striking expansion and reconstruction so as to accommodate it incredibly increasing populations.
It is clear that the housing area and business district have been enlarged during the given period, the airport in the South-East of the city has also been extended in order to satisfy the need of the ten-fold growth in population, at around 200000 people at the moment. Apart from some main roads and the government building, which were kept intact during the renovation, the city witnessed the emergence of a lake in the heart of the area, which used to be a part of the river in 1950, accordingly, new roads and a new bridge have been built with the aim of not only connecting two sides of the riverbank but also improve the area’s accessibility. The erection of a dam with a view to hold on water is also a part of the construction plan of the city.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-22 hahoaan 73 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 78 view
2024-11-11 hahoaan 84 view
2024-11-10 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-10 Giang Tran 84 view
Essays by user nhattram39 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...a striking expansion and reconstruction so as to accommodate it incredibly increasing po...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he heart of the area, which used to be a part of the river in 1950, accordingly, ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, so, apart from, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54545454545 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76021832968 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593582887701 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.388044863 43.030603864 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.0 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4 22.9334400587 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114012890713 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581595103128 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026496709928 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073207540351 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313912964659 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.