Some people believe that single-sex school students perform better academically. However, others believe that both gender schools provide children with the best social skills for adulthood. Discuss both perspectives and give your opinion?
People have different views about the types of schools that play a crucial role in juveniles’ academic performance and preparation for adulthood. While separate schools with only one gender provide students with academic achievement to some extent, I would argue that co-ed education is a better option for teenagers’ maturity and socialism.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why single-gender education brings a great number of benefits for adolescents in terms of study results. The first justification is that since there is no gender discrimination, students in schools that teach only one gender are encouraged to build up their confidence and avoid feeling self-deprecating in comparison with the other sex. For example, in general, male pupils are higher appreciated to do better in sports and science-related subjects rather than females. By contrast, female students in single-sex schools can also pursue sports like football and even form teams to compete against each other. Another advantage is to enhance the productivity of students. If youngsters enroll in mix-sex schools, they could cope with problems such as early romantic relationships which may influence negatively the attention in the class. Consequently, attending single-gender schools allows young cohorts to concentrate more on their study.
On the other hand, I side with people whose notion is that integrated education creates more favorable conditions for children’s adulthood. The first and foremost explanation is that adolescents of both genders may have the opportunity to explore each other’s perspectives as well as their similarities and differences. This not only helps teenagers to have a better insight into co-existence and gender equality but also eliminates any discrimination. Furthermore, a majority of single-sex school students are recorded to be introverted when talking to opposite-sex people. Therefore, registering co-education setting contributes to both males’ and females’ communication capability, especially when they take part in group work activities in workplaces. Finally, the interaction between pupils of both genders enables them to learn a wider range of skills, which improve educational outcomes including good academic performance and practical skills such as problem-solving skills instead of only theoretical knowledge.
In conclusion, various people think that single-gender education offer students with higher academic performance, whereas integrated schools support them in a much better way for adulthood, I believe the latter is a wiser choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-12 | Võ Thùy Dương | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People have different views about the ty...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for teenagers’ maturity and socialism. On the one hand, there are a variety of ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'appreciated doing'.
Suggestion: appreciated doing
...ple, in general, male pupils are higher appreciated to do better in sports and science-related su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts to concentrate more on their study. On the other hand, I side with people wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ty to explore each other’s perspectives as well as their similarities and differences. Thi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...instead of only theoretical knowledge. In conclusion, various people think that...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in general, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81413612565 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27638796122 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604712041885 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3068319789 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.8125 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402520784577 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113739527836 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706416590947 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252282118932 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292654632957 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.