Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the era of advanced technology, the issue of whether smartphones bring more benefits than drawbacks has been a topic of discussion for many years. While some people believe that using mobile phones exerts a negative impact on social interaction, this essay will argue that the innovation of phones has significantly bettered people’s social life.
First and foremost, the various resources that mobile phones have brought to socialization enable users to expand their social circle. In the past, people used to have limited options to meet with others, whereas there are various methods to know and make friends with common grounds with the assistance of different applications on phones nowadays. For instance, the young generation now is more likely to start friendships via social media, such as Facebook, Instagram and WeChat, chatting online without stepping out. In this case, having a smartphone helps them to start their social interaction.
Another advantage of the widespread usage of smartphones is that the quality of interaction has been improved dramatically. This gives people opportunities to communicate remotely through not only the texts but photos, voice and videos shared with each other instantly. For example, family and friends who were living overseas highly depended on video calls, which allowed them to see their situations clearly and directly, to keep in touch and maintain relationships during the COVID pandemic when international travelling was suspended in Australia. Thus, it is possible for users to enjoy a premium quality of services according to social connections with others.
In conclusion, this essay has argued that phones produce a positive, rather than detrimental effect/ influence on social interaction because it provides platforms to build and keep relationships. Globally, people will have a better social life with the sophisticated innovations of smartphones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-04 | deep979kaur | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | Sherzodbek25 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | Nguyễn Ninh | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-27 | khiem910 | 78 | view |
- in some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage Others said there are better ways to stop them fr 79
- The line below shows the time school children spend on different home activities 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighbourhood (the area where they live) than now. 73
- Some people believe that the range of technology available is increasing the gap between the rich and poor in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view What can wealthier societies do to help poor people 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icantly bettered people’s social life. First and foremost, the various resource...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...em to start their social interaction. Another advantage of the widespread usag...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to social connections with others. In conclusion, this essay has argued tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60616438356 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92252135582 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63698630137 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3529489132 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.416666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162399875451 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626871492292 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453326521304 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10573094571 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362730733094 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.