Some people believe that students in schools learn better when they study in groups. Others say school students learn better when they study on their own. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, many hold the view that group learning is a better way to students’ study at school, while there is a body of opinion which claims that independent learning will benefit students more. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate and give my opinion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that by studying together students can have better understanding of what they are learning. This is because other classmates will offer different perspectives about the knowledge instructed by teachers, which means that learners can absorb it in various ways when they choose group study. In addition, studying with others can help pupils learn efficiently, for this study mode can provide them with an environment where they are often required to collaborate in order to complete tasks. To be specific, students do not have to finish reading all the chapters of a book assigned by their professors and instead they should only carry out parts of them when they work with other peers.
On other hand, however, learning independently can help students acquire more knowledge. Compared with those who decide to learn in a group, they can start their learning immediately without waiting until others are ready, which can allow them to spare more time on their study and gain more. Furthermore, through leaning individually, pupils are able to concentrate on their study, as they may not be distracted by the discussion with others when there are problems occurring.
To summarize, there is no doubt that collective studying can enable students to have comprehensive knowledge and study efficiency. At the same time, however, studying alone can make it possible for students to obtain more knowledge. In the final analysis, therefore, I can only conclude that cooperative learning is superior to independent study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-11 | vishal sachdeva | 95 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | Mikul Patel | 71 | view |
| 2018-11-30 | Frank Chen | 68 | view |
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Do the problems brought by international travel outweigh the advantages? 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 56
- Space research is a waste of money. The government should spend money on improving conditions of people living on Earth. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that group learning is a bette...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to group'
Suggestion: to group
...orb it in various ways when they choose group study. In addition, studying with other...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7809959589 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8007293064 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360809453715 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138108167534 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063275352777 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228988511505 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531835199668 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.