Some people believe that technology has brought more harm than good. Do you agree or disagree?
The progress in various sciencies has been a major source of the improvements in peoples’ live’s standards. The recent advancements in technologies are considered to be the bane to a society by some individuals. I am strongly disagree with this opinion, since automation of manufactures and revolution in online instant communication has dramatically improved our lives.
The automation of factories increases the performance of production, the quality of goods and diminishs prices, allowing people to possess more of them. This is achieved by reducing production costs by replacing manual labour with computers. In addition, automation entails less faults since computers has been proven to be more reliable and robust than humans. For example, the BMW has reported the reduction of production costs on ten percent after computarization of their factories, while production speed has doubled. Thus, autonomus manufacturing brings abundance of different goods on markets as well as improves the quality of them.
In addition to the above-mentioned phenomenon, technologies has revulutionized the way people communicate with each other with the high speed internet connection. Social network, messengers and e-mails bring individuals together, allowing them to interact with each other from different parts of the world. Moreover, it provides an ability to orginize production lines that are distributed all over the world. For instance, the Apple’s headquarter is located in the US, while their chips are manufactured in Europe and their smartphones are produced in China, which would be hardly achievable without the internet. In other words, instant communication give an efficient tool for all human beings.
In conclusion, I truly believe that technologies has not brought more harm than good for a society, since it has improved a number of areas for every human.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below give information about the percentages of the world population living in various parts of the world in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below give information about the percentages of the world population living in various parts of the world in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie charts below give information about the percentages of the world population living in various parts of the world in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The number of old people is increasing in many countries Some people think this causes problems whilst other people think that old people have an important role to play Discuss both views 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...iety by some individuals. I am strongly disagree with this opinion, since automation of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun faults is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...puters. In addition, automation entails less faults since computers has been proven ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61403508772 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18867262633 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60350877193 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7388681566 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180868195955 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558881754378 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748617133861 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128401738936 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935962610079 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.