Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
When it comes to the sentences of various criminals, the punishments largely depends on the legislation system in my country China. There is no doubt that legislation is the most objective and unbiased criteria, but some people hold the opinion that other peripheral components should be taken into consideration regarding to the decision of final sentence. From my point of view, it is true fixed punishment is definitely necessary in certain occasions, yet other ingredients like incentives and circumstance are also supposed to be referred to, and let me illustrate my perspective as follows.
To begin with, punishments should be fixed for each category of crime, and this implementation would be beneficial on a large scale. Firstly, it would be time-efficient for administration and government because there won’t be many necessities for discussions on a court. For another aspect, citizens are likely to be more convinced by the law system, which is unprejudiced in any circumstance, and thereby people might be more satisfied about the administration of their country. Briefly, fixed penalties could be somewhat advantageous for both government and dwellers.
Nevertheless, other peripheral parts are supposed to be considered as to different incentive of crime. For one thing, personal situation should be partially taken into account when deciding the final penalty. For example, a murderer in China murdered six people because they utilized his mother to browbeat him in 2017. What I’m trying to say is that in such an urgent occasion, he perpetrated the murder due to no alternative solution, and subsequently, the judger on the court lessened his imprisonment. In short, it is inevitable for administration department to make a reference on criminal’s circumstance at the time of crime.
For another aspect, what motivates law violators to commit certain crimes should also be referred to in order to make the sentence more justifiable. Some criminals might go astray and be seduced by other things like others’ aggressive words, and they should not be given heavy penalty if they confess lately. However, for those recidivists who commit felonies simply because of their incorrigible human nature, their sentences should be prolonged. To sum up, it only makes sense that original motivation for committing crimes are counted when making punishments.
In conclusion, criminals’ punishments should largely depend on fixed standards for each type of crime and slightly take other situations into consideration like their situations and motivations. Just like an old saying in China goes ‘Every evil has its own temptation’.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | olParya | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | tkngan213 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | khanhptk162 | 61 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- The charts blow show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- "Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of tra 69
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in short, no doubt, for one thing, it is true, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52554744526 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26400273686 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576642335766 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4629139322 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5555555556 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452096489204 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144712152066 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818881296129 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245503198873 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613183184464 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.