We all know that every crime has a punishment. But in our case will be discussion between two types of opinions. There are that for each type of crime ought to be fixed punishment and that motivation to crime also ought to have its own type of punishment.
Does fixed punishment mean that all crime will be evaluated and have the same fine? So, it will not be right to give the same penalty for people who stall bread and who killed someone. Everything has its own level. For instance, if there is different and reliable fixed punishment for different types of crime, that everyone already will know. They will think about their future problems. People before commitig a crime will think about opportunities of having already known amount and type of punishment and about doing it.
As we said some people agree to have punishment for motives of crime, but every action has their own reasons and motives. For example, let’s take two people. Perhaps one of them killed someone with special intent to kill while the other one was trying to save himself from the another attacker and killed him. If there is the same fixed punishment for every murder, both of them will receive the same punishment. This is unfair.
1 In my opinion, both viens, as we mentioned have advantages and disadvantages we can use both type of punishment with fixed amount and with taking to account their motives by considering them and by choosing ways to use it for finding justice. I believe that judges solve problems with crime and give them very fairly punishments by taking into account levels of crime and motives
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services-to the UK economy in the twentieth century.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 78
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services-to the UK economy in the twentieth century.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 73
- The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... future problems. People before commitig a crime will think about opportunities o...
^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pinion, both viens, as we mentioned have advantages and disadvantages we can use ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75268817204 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41541428724 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505376344086 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.3503146787 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.875 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329252175389 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113907203908 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907095135459 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217811991604 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598300528761 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.