Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes(for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or taeching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views on whether high school students should take part in the non-paid work for their local communities. While I disagree with the idea of making such programmes compulsory, I do believe that voluntary community service could benefit young people.
There are three reason why public service working is benefit for the youth. Firstly, when teenagers participate in some charity activities, they can learn how to take care others, such as the elderly or the child that help them development better or make them growth in these projects. Secondly, teenagers take part in the community service that can improve their communication skills that adapt the social life which will be an eligible society member. Thirdly, our communities not only include the adult, but also include the youth, everyone have responsibility to build up our community that let it become a harmonious community.
However, I disagree with these services should be compulsory programmes. On one hand, free to work for communities that children may be worked casually because there is no award to attract their attention which they may mindlessness. On the other hand, there are many difficult and heavy subjects for high school students to learn which compulsory community services may aggravate the burden of study tasks. In addition, some students will generate some sense of annoying from these activities that decrease their ethusiasm in serving their communities.
In conclusion, my view is community service with many advantages to the high school but it can not be a compulsory part of high school programmes which can encourage students to willing to serve the communities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | phannhi1511@ | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | ankhanhvien | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | trangiangtie | 73 | view |
- In many countries more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like televisions microwave ovens and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- In many countries more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like televisions microwave ovens and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 84
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31954887218 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76726716078 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9753875565 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.636363636 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6363636364 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329221976442 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12759574291 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609080641221 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209798313028 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488365350904 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.