Progressively, schools as educational institutions have been considering about mundatory unpaid community service programmes lately. Some individuals opine that it is a necessity in order to bring up decent members of society. Likewise, I strengly agree with a point of view that volunteer projects such as charity work, teaching to younger children and improvement of the neighbourhood ought to be a compulsory part of afterschool activities since this novelty has overwhelming advantages.
Firstly, by doing unsalaried work, students have wider range of opportunities to experience such noble feeling as generensity or altruism since they have to help other volunteers who have decided to aid only in selfless concerns. As a consequence, pupils start to cherish both material and spiritual values. For instance, when students guide younger one, they can truly understand their own teachers. Besides, considering difficulties of work with children, they learn patience and grow in wisdom. Not only become volunteers mentally strouger, but they also are more involved into social problems, therefore, try to solve them.
Furthermore, there is one beneficial side effect, which is indeed useful in planning future. Honorary work have been valued highly at all times, especially in finding a job. Take for example an ordinary resume, when a person sends their CV to an employer, they are considered immediately as more effective worker owing to their experience in team work and social communications. Moreover, social skills gained during voluntary programmes are favourable in the further work.
On the other hand, there is still a significant drowback in terms of finance. In general, all implementations of community service into school curriculum nice have colossal costs, in particular, for creating efficient system and its realization. Nevertheless, in long-term outlook, all these innovations, as well as results, will undoubtedly cover expenditures.
Altogether, I am completely convinced that gratuitous work in community service as a necessary part of high school will be advantagous for both students and the society.
- The widespread use of the Internet has thought many problems. What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of the web? What solutions can you suggest? 89
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007. 56
- TOEFL integrated writing: Dutch painter Rembrandt 73
- The charts show information about the number of UK university students and government spending and types of student's family economic background in 1991. 89
- The two maps below shows road access to a hospital in 2007 and in 2009 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, likewise, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in general, in particular, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66978193146 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17585929145 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663551401869 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3806468901 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3125 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249147264804 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656446603944 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686784216503 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140300611481 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078126345692 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.