Some people believe that the use of mobile phones in public is as annoying as smoking and should be banned, similarly to smoking. Give your opinion and examples from your own experience
These days, the number of mobile phone users has increased significantly. No one can argue that a mobile phone has many positive effects to our lives such as communication or entertainment. However, some people think that most people use phone excessively and disturb others in public places which is as worse as smoking in a public. Consequently, some people advice that the regulation of using mobile phone in a public should be released which can control phone users. This issue will be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, using a mobile is very important in some situations. An emergency case such as accident or get in a trouble requires this electronic device to ask for help or contact somebody. If we do not allow people to carry a mobile phone around a city or use for some reasons, it will be hard to figure it out or find someone to rescue. Moreover, most people always carry a phone which communicate only in a certain issues and do not answer a phone without unnecessary matters or appropriately ways. Therefore, the use of phone in a public should not be restricted by a city law because it is very vital to use in some cases.
Secondly, most people who advanced and educated enough have good manners in a public. They will not turn on a mobile phone with loud ring-tones, answer a call inappropriately or even speak a phone with so annoying voice. Most people always use head phone for listening or talking and some never use their phone in any quiet places.
On the other hand, even though most people always respect each other, some phone users still inconvenience others by using the phone in public. The using phone excessively in a public can annoy people surrounding and pollute the atmosphere to be very noisy. The quiet and peace of some places such as a library or temple will be disappeared from phone ringing or talking voice. Therefore, with a phone regulation, it will improve the atmosphere and keep peaceful.
To sum up, in my opinion, I disagree with limiting using phone in public. This is because, the use of phone in some accidental cases is very essential and it is inevitable to restrict people to use them in a public. Without a mobile phone, it will bring some negative effects to human lives. However, in quiet areas, the use of phone still should be limited which will not destroy the atmosphere and will not annoy others.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 70
- Many people have learned a foreign language in their own country; other have learned a foreign language in the country in which it is spoken. Which is better? Give the advantages if each and support your viewpoint. 80
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 70
- The chart illustrates housing preferences among people who lived in the British cities of London, Oxford and Cambridge in the year 2005. 70
- Why should the government help working parents by providing child care facilities. 70
most people always carry a phone which communicate only in a certain issues
most people always carry a phone to communicate only in certain issues
flaws:
No. of Words: 417 while No. of Different Words: 184
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 417 350
No. of Characters: 1907 1500
No. of Different Words: 184 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.519 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.573 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.538 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.182 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.378 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.542 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5