Some people believe that vertical city in which people work and live in toll building is a good idea other say horizontal living is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that vertical city in which people work and live in toll building is a good idea other say horizontal living is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

Lifestyle has undergone the dramatic changes over the couple of decades. Presently,A chunk of masses think that high rise building in which people work and live in premsis building is a good idea. While others say that flat building is lucrative for people to live and work. Here, this easy will discuss both sides with my own perceptions.

There are manifold points to share up the former view. First and foremost, vertical building good place for work and live. To illustrate, A massive number of masses migrate to other nation To get work and live in it. So it is a beneficial for people it can reduce space problem. Moreover, city dwellers can earn good money by giving their Apartment on their rent. For example, people get migrate to other country. They can buy a apartment on rent. As a result, by giving their apartment on rent is worthwhile for dwellers to earn bread and butter or better money. Furthermore, To established a toll building on preserved land for many other sector. They can utilized such as, they can use for hospital, any other business meant, like as international embassy so on. Which make people very comfortable.

On the other hand. There are some conflicting view, horizontal building better for live comfortable and better for work. The building save us life because they can less damage during earthquakes and save the pollution. The horizontal building use for shops so on. Apart from it, the horizontal building is comfortable for old and disable people. They can easy to up and down for doing work or to live in comfortable life with any stress.

To recapitulate, both sides have own significant, vertical building are fruitful for work or living comfortable life. They can reduce space problem in future is more beneficial for people. They do not cut tress for prepare house.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-03 Jaspreet sidhu 56 view
Essays by user Jaspreet sidhu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , A
...es over the couple of decades. Presently,A chunk of masses think that high rise bu...
^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... migrate to other country. They can buy a apartment on rent. As a result, by givi...
^
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'utilize'
Suggestion: utilize
...ed land for many other sector. They can utilized such as, they can use for hospital, any...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t, like as international embassy so on. Which make people very comfortable. On the...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, for example, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89644012945 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60801268922 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5874632585 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.0416666667 106.682146367 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.875 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339799108847 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105010428214 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964475230572 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222576468607 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911472699154 0.056905535591 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.0946893788 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 50.2224549098 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.25 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.